October 18, 2007 – David Eng: “The Art of Waiting: Queer Diasporas and The Book of Salt”

LECTURE
The Art of Waiting: Queer Diasporas and The Book of Salt
Thursday, October 18 / 4 PM / Humanities 210

David Eng’s forthcoming book, The Feeling of Kinship: Queer Diasporas and the Racialization of Intimacy, examines the impact of Asian diasporic and queer social movements on conventional structures of family and kinship in the U.S. It explores the ways race is exploited and privatized in a “colorblind” age to shore up ideals of family and kinship in the global North. The book also investigates why we have numerous poststructuralist accounts of language but few poststructuralist accounts of kinship. This presentation, drawn from The Feeling of Kinship, explores Monique Truong’s 2003 novel The Book of Salt in relation to issues of historiography and historicism. When Gertrude Stein and Alice B. Toklas were expatriates living in Paris, the American couple employed a series of Vietnamese cooks. Truong’s novel is told from the cook’s point of view. In this talk, Eng asks why it is that Stein and Toklas can appear in history as the iconic lesbian couple of modernism and modernity while Bình, the “gay” migrant laborer, cannot appear. In other words, how is it that Stein and Toklas are placed in history while Bình is displaced from it? As an “Asian American,” “refugee,” “postcolonial,” and “queer” text, The Book of Salt positions itself within and against the historiography of modernism by illuminating what this historiography obscures: the more extensive forms of social violence and forgetting that configure the political as well as epistemological limits of modernity.

SEMINAR
Transnational Adoption, Racial Melancholia, and Racial Reparation
Friday, October 19 / 10 AM – 12 PM / Humanities 210

David Eng’s previous work has explored the relationship between racial melancholia and processes of immigration, racialization, and assimilation for Asian Americans. In these two essays, he considers how the contemporary practice of transnational adoption traces out a psychic and social arc from racial melancholia to racial reparation. He writes, “If racial reparation might be considered a constrained response to the psychic and social pressures of racial melancholia, I would like us to consider collectively in this seminar how, and under what conditions, the disparate paradigms of psychic and political reparation might be brought together in a productive manner. In other words, what (if any) is the relationship between psychic reparation, which is at the heart of object relations theory (Melanie Klein), and political reparation, which is central to histories of genocide, slavery, apartheid, comfort women, and other crimes against humanity?”

David L. Eng is Professor of English at the University of Pennsylvania. He is the author of The Feeling of Kinship: Queer Diasporas and the Racialization of Intimacy (Duke, forthcoming) and Racial Castration: Managing Masculinity in Asian America (Duke, 2001). In addition, he is co-editor with David Kazanjian of Loss: The Politics of Mourning (California, 2003); with Alice Y. Hom of Q & A: Queer in Asian America (Temple, 1998); and with Judith Halberstam and José Muñoz of a special issue of the journal Social Text (2005) entitled “What’s Queer about Queer Studies Now?” Professor Eng is the current co-chair of the Board of Directors of the Asian American Writers’ Workshop as well as the former chair of the Board of Directors of the Center for Lesbian and Gay Studies, both based in New York City. Prior to joining the University of Pennsylvania, he was a faculty member at Columbia University and Rutgers University and was also a visiting professor at Hong Kong University and Harvard University. He received his Ph.D. in Comparative Literature from the University of California at Berkeley.

For a copy of the seminar readings, please email cult@ucsc.edu.

October 11, 2007 – Kara Keeling: “Looking for Marquise: Queer Temporality, Black Political Possibility, and Poetry from the Future”

Thursday, October 11 / 4 PM / Humanities 210

Kara Keeling works on film, media, and popular culture, and across the disciplines of media studies (especially film and television theory and criticism), cultural studies, critical theory, Black studies, and women’s studies. Her essays on media and popular culture have appeared in The Black Scholar and Qui Parle. Her essay “‘Joining the Lesbians’: Cinematic Regimes of Black Lesbian Visibility” appeared in Black Queer Studies: A Critical Anthology (eds. Patrick and Mae G. Henderson, Duke, 2005.) She is completing a book manuscript entitled The Witch’s Flight: The Cinematic, the Black Femme, and the Image of Common Sense. Professor Keeling’s talk will focus on the films The Aggressives (dir. Wakefield Poole, 2005) and Brother to Brother (dir. Rodney Evans, 2004).

For more information contact blackculturalstudies@ucsc.edu.

Sponsored by the Black Cultural Studies Research Cluster

October 9, 2007 – Adi Ophir: “Space, Time, and Violence in the Palestinian Occupied Territories”

Monday, October 9 / 4PM / Oakes Mural Room

Adi Ophir is Associate Professor at the Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas at Tel Aviv University, and is research fellow at the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute and the Shalom Hartman Institute for Jewish Studies. An activist and a scholar, his research centers on modern and contemporary continental philosophy in the domains of ethics, political philosophy, and critical theory. His books include Working for the Present (Avodat Hahove, Hakkibutz Hameuchad 2001) and, with Ariella Azoulay, Terrible Days (Yamim Raim, Resling 2002). In 2005, Zone Books of MIT Press published Ophir’s The Order of Evils, an English translation of a Hebrew original published in 2000. This erudite, rich, and experimentally structured philosophical text asks fundamental questions about moral judgment in the wake of Heideggerian and poststructualist philosophy. Shaped by reflections on the Holocaust and on Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory, Adi Ophir offers new perspectives on evil, emphasizing its existential and political character, and suggests new ground for moral being in the present age. About his current work, he writes:

I am currently engaged in research on “states of disaster”. The contemporary state is the main institution capable of and responsible for protecting the people it governs against disasters – natural and man-made alike. At the same time, the state is capable of creating conditions and implementing policies that turn out to be catastrophic for its own subjects as well as for the subjects of other states. Today, “the providential state” and “the catastrophic state” seem as but two aspects of what Carl Schmitt called “the total state” and its apparatuses. In my research I am trying to reconstruct the genealogy, the theological and metaphysical presuppositions, and the modus operandi of each of these two “state formations,” questioning the common wisdom that sees them as two sides of a single dialectical process in which progress and destruction are inevitably linked. This research is inspired by a long term interest in and opposition to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, which lately, in response to the outbreak of the second Intifada, has turned catastrophic for the Palestinian non-citizens of Israel. My talk will be based on a joint work with Ariella Azoulay in which we study the modus operandi of the Israeli occupying power.

October 5, 2007 – Experiments in Preparation

Friday, October 5 / 1–4 PM / Humanities 210

This event presents a forum for interdisciplinary scholars in science and technology studies to offer fragments, nascent thought formations, and elusive ideas. Through the interplay of less-than-complete papers, the cluster will experiment with the ways that early interaction inflects more fully realized work. In keeping with our current theme, Risk and Play: Experiments in Knowing and Relating, this discussion will encourage collective speculative engagement as a form of experimental academic practice. Topics of exploration include human/ non-human relatings, ecologies of hope, and the ethics of scientific experimentation. We welcome interlocutors from all disciplines to collaborate with our presenters.

For more information contact: Martha Kenney, mkenney@ucsc.edu.

Sponsored by the Science Studies Research Cluster

May 17, 2007 – Kara Keeling: “Looking for Marquise: Queer Temporality, Black Political Possibility, and Poetry from the Future”

Kara Keeling
Critical Studies and American Studies and Ethnicity, USC

Looking for Marquise: Queer Temporality, Black Political Possibility, and Poetry from the Future

Thursday, May 17 / 12 PM / Humanities 210

Kara Keeling works on film, media, and popular culture, and across the disciplines of media studies (especially film and television theory and criticism), cultural studies, critical theory, Black studies, and women’s studies. Her essays on media and popular culture have appeared in The Black Scholar and Qui Parle. Her essay “‘Joining the Lesbians’: Cinematic Regimes of Black Lesbian Visibility” appeared in Black Queer Studies: A Critical Anthology (eds. Patrick and Mae G. Henderson, Duke, 2005.) She is completing a book manuscript entitled The Witch’s Flight: The Cinematic, the Black Femme, and the Image of Common Sense. Professor Keeling’s talk will focus on the films The Aggressives(dir. Wakefield Poole, 2005) and Brother to Brother (dir. Rodney Evans, 2004).

For more information contact blackculturalstudies@ucsc.edu.

Sponsored by the Black Cultural Studies Research Cluster

May 10, 2007 – A Conversation with Jasbir Puar

Moderated by Anjali Arondekar, Feminist Studies, UC Santa Cruz

Thursday, May 10 / 2:30 PM / Humanities 210

Jasbir K. Puar is Assistant Professor of Women’s and Gender Studies and a member of the Graduate Program in the Department of Geography at Rutgers University. She will present material from her forthcoming book on terror, affect, race, and sex titled Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times (Duke, 2007). Puar is also working on India Shining, a video project about the challenges of South Asian progressive organizations in New York City to the Hindutva nationalist and communalist politics of the annual India Day parade. Recent publications include “Mapping U.S. Homonormativities,” Gender, Place, and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography (February 2006) and “On Torture: Abu Ghraib,” Radical History Review (Fall 2005).

For more information, please contact Heather Turcotte at hmturcotte@juno.com

Sponsored by the Africana Dialogues Research Cluster and the Queer Theory Research Cluster

May 3, 2007 – David Simpson: “The Ghostliness of Things: The Poetics of Commodity Form”

Thursday, May 3 / 4 PM / Humanities 210

After authoring a number of pathbreaking works in nineteenth-century studies—on romanticism, the English and American novels, the English language in the U.S., and other topics—David Simpson began to make a series of broad critical interventions in theory and criticism. Romanticism, Nationalism, and the Revolt Against Theory (Chicago, 1993) gave a convincing and original genealogy of Anglo-American resistance to theory, filiating it to eighteenth-century British conservatism’s ideology of nationalism and common sense. The Academic Postmodern and the Rule of Literature: A Report on Half Knowledge (Chicago, 1995) does similar genealogical work with postmodern theory, analyzing some of the political and ideological consequences of postmodernism’s unacknowledged roots in literary studies. Situatedness, or, Why We Keep Saying Where We’re Coming From (Duke, 2002), is an exploration of the aporetic, antinomic quality of the universalist/situated binary in a range of discourses: legal reasoning, social science, literature, biography, and philosophy. Following the aftermath of September 11th, David Simpson wrote a series of widely discussed essays on the dominant U.S. discourses of apocalypse and commemoration. These and additional essays are collected in 9/11: The Culture of Commemoration (Chicago, 2006). His talk is from a project titled “Wordsworth’s Spectral Modernity: Commodification and the Poetics of Social Concern.”

He writes:

It takes up the uncannily unresolvable qualities of Wordsworth’s poetic encounters with strangers, especially needy or afflicted persons, which subsist without such familiarizing resources as sympathy, charity, hospitality or even dialogue itself. As such these poems undercut the civil society discourse that has been a linchpin of the neoliberal consensus since the triumph of the ‘West’ in 1989. Instead they reflect and embody the effects of a rapid increase in the effects of commodification (an increase in the scale and influence of commodity form) around 1800, a process analyzed by Marx, restored to literary life by Derrida, and poetically staged by Wordsworth. The abstraction performed by commodity form as the agent and distributor of social as well as economic relations renders virtual and indeed spectral the characters in poetic stories, who appear as figures of death in life. It is also reflected in and analyzed by a Wordsworthian aesthetic that is critically concerned about the ambiguous and often death-dealing effects of poetic images whose mortifying attributes are not restricted to the worn coinages of poetic diction but impinge also upon the best aspirations of high poetry. Finally it is in the sphere of reading and the context of print culture that ghostliness, commodification and concern come together to create a poetry whose analytic power is as fresh now as it was in 1800, because the mature capitalist formation that Wordsworth saw coming into being has not yet become a thing of the past.

Spring 2007 Colloquium Series

Colloquium Series

In spring 2007, the Center for Cultural Studies will continue to host a Wednesday colloquium series, which features current cultural studies work by campus faculty and visitors. The sessions are informal, normally consisting of a 30-40 minute presentation followed by discussion. We gather at noon, with presentations beginning at 12:15. Participants are encouraged to bring their own lunches; the Center will provide coffee, tea, and cookies.

Schedule
ALL COLLOQUIA ARE IN HUMANITIES 1, ROOM 210

April 11
Georges Van Den Abbeele
(Dean of Humanities, UC Santa Cruz)
Globalizing the Enlightenment

April 18
James Buzard
(Literature, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Autoethnography, Narrative, Interruption

April 25
Daniel Laforest
(Center for Cultural Studies, UC Santa Cruz)
Rediscovering America: The Secret Link Between Alan Lomax’s Writings and Quebec’s Cinéma Direct Tradition

May 2
Seth Moglen
(English, American Studies, & Africana Studies, Lehigh University)
Mourning Modernity: Literary Modernism and the Injuries of American Capitalism

May 9
Eugene Holland
(French and Italian, Ohio State University)
Schizoanalysis, Nomadology, Fascism: Just How Close Have We Come?

May 16
Matthew O’Hara
(History, UC Santa Cruz)
Modernity Via the Whip: Self and Collective in the Holy Schools of Christ, New Spain

May 23
Kimberly Lau
(American Studies, UC Santa Cruz)
Body Language: Notes on Discourse, Ethnography, and Embodiment

May 30
María Puig de la Bellacasa Mejia
(Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellow and the Center for Cultural Studies, UC Santa Cruz)
Matters of Care

Participants
GEORGES VAN DEN ABBEELE became Dean of Humanities at UC Santa Cruz in July 2006, coming from UC Davis, where his positions included Director of the Pacific Regional Humanities Center and Professor of Humanities. A renowned scholar of French literature and theory, world literature and cultural studies, and emergent global and transnational discourses, including studies of Vietnamese literature, Asian American writing, and Belgian literature, identity, and culture, Van Den Abbeele was also responsible, through numerous scholarly studies and translations, for introducing the work of Jean-François Lyotard to the English-speaking world. His numerous books include Travel as Metaphor: From Montaigne to Rousseau(Minnesota, 1992), French Civilization and its Discontents: Nationalism, Colonialism, Race (co-edited with Tyler Stovall, Rowman and Littlefield, 2003), and the forthcoming The Retreat of the French Intellectual. His talk investigates some recent attempts to think about the 18th century in a properly global way.

JAMES BUZARD is Professor and Chair of Literature at MIT. His work centers on British fiction, travel writing, and cultural institutions in a global context, with particular focus on the discourses of travel and tourism. In addition to articles on travel and tourism, autoethnographic authority, and Victorian ethnography, he is the author of The Beaten Track: European Tourism, Literature, and the Ways to “Culture,” 1800-1918 (Oxford, 1993). His most recent book is Disorienting Fiction: The Autoethnographic Work of 19th-Century British Novels (Princeton, 2005). His reading of Dickens, Bronte, Eliot, et. al. as “metropolitan autoethnographies” not only filiates these texts to earlier versions of the autoethnographic mode, but also traces the influences these novels exerted on later instances of national ethnographic imaginings. His talk is from his current book project, which is an extension of the argument of Disorienting Fiction into the modernist era. 

DANIEL LAFOREST is a Resident Scholar at the Center for Cultural Studies. He received his Ph.D. in Literature from the Université de Québec at Montréal. His project at the Center is on the past, present, and possible futures of the notion of hinterland in North America. His talk is drawn from his forthcoming book,Le Pays Incertain de Caïn: Pierre Perrault et la Poétique du Territoire (Caïn’s Uncertain Country: Pierre Perrault and the Poetics of Territory). He writes, “I try to show how the crossing of U.S. internal and ideological boundaries in Lomax’s ‘discovery’ of the blues, as a subjective reconstruction of the hinterland, have informed and influenced Perrault’s groundbreaking conception of the ‘cinema direct’ (or ‘cinema-vérité’).”

SETH MOGLEN is Associate Professor in the English Department at Lehigh University, where he also teaches in the American Studies and Africana Studies Programs, and where he has recently been appointed Director of the Humanities Center. In 2006 he wrote an introduction for and edited a new edition of T. Thomas Fortune’s Black and White: Land, Labor, and Politics in the South, a neglected nineteenth-century masterpiece of the African-American radical political tradition (Simon and Schuster, 2006). His talk is drawn from his forthcoming book Mourning Modernity: Literary Modernism and the Injuries of American Capitalism(Stanford, 2007). Moglen contends that American literary modernism can be understood as a collective cultural effort to mourn for the destructive effects of modern capitalism. In developing this argument, he will offer both a revisionary account of the politics of American modernism and a psychoanalytic model for thinking more generally about what it means for societies to grieve over destructive social transformations.

EUGENE HOLLAND is Professor of French at the Ohio State University. He specializes in contemporary social theory; modern French history, literature, and culture; and postcolonial and transnational literature and politics. In addition to a number of articles on poststructuralist theory, and particularly the work of Gilles Deleuze, he is the author of Baudelaire and Schizoanalysis: The Sociopoetics of Modernism (Cambridge, 1993) and Introduction to Schizoanalysis (Routledge, 1999). He writes, “The aim of this paper is two-fold: (1) to improve the concept of fascism offered by Deleuze and Guattari by (a) resolving/mitigating the differences between divergent versions of the concept in their writings and by (b) bringing the concept into closer contact with what we know about real historical instances of fascism and fundamentalism in inter-war Europe and North America, respectively; and 2) to use this concept to better understand the senses in which the current Bush regime can be considered fascist.”

MATTHEW O’HARA is Assistant Professor of History at UC Santa Cruz, having previously taught at New Mexico State University. His work centers on race, religion, and ethnicity in colonial Mexico. In addition to many articles on these and related topics, his work includes the forthcoming A Flock Divided: Race, Religion, and Politics in Mexico, 1749-1857 (Duke) and Imperial Subjects: Race and Identity in Colonial Latin America (co-edited with Andrew Fisher, Duke). He writes, “In the eighteenth century, Catholic sodalities called Holy Schools of Christ flourished in the cities of New Spain (Mexico). The Holy Schools were decidedly hybrid institutions: they promoted an intense regimen of physical mortification, but they combined it with internal or mental prayer. The talk addresses a number of questions regarding religious practice in New Spain, and the place of religion in a larger narrative of Latin American modernity.”

KIMBERLY LAU is Associate Professor of American Studies at UC Santa Cruz, having recently taught at the University of Utah. Trained in Folklore at the University of Pennsylvania, she is one of the important innovative voices in new folklore studies, extending its scope into areas of race, gender, political economy, and globalization. Her book New Age Capitalism: Making Money East of Eden (Pennsylvania, 2000) is an important study of the discourse and marketing of new age products and practices, including tai chi, aromatherapy, yoga, and macrobiotics. Her talk is on her ethnographic work with Sisters in Shape, a black women’s health and fitness project based in Philadelphia.

MARIA PUIG DE LA BELLACASA MEJIA is a postdoctoral fellow affiliated with the Center for Cultural Studies at UC Santa Cruz, having received her Ph.D. in Philosophy from the Université Libre de Bruxelles (Belgium) in 2004. Her work is at the intersection of feminist philosophy and science studies, and her articles and book chapters include “Building Standpoints” (with Sarah Bracke) in The Standpoint Reader (ed. Sandra Harding Routledge, 2004) and “Divergences Solidaires: Autour des Politiques Féministes des Savoirs Situés” (Divergences in Solidarity: On the Feminist Politics of Situated Knowledges, Multitudes, 12, 2003). She contextualizes her talk by noting that “feminists have reclaimed the work of caring, rethinking its significance in personal/private relationships, envisioning care as a generic relational experience with political, ethical and epistemological implications. Thinking of care politically remains an uneasy move in some circles, as it implies thinking through gendered boundaries dividing affects from reason, body from mind, and remunerated from unremunerated labor.”

April 26, 2007 – Ghassan Hage: “Cultures of Exterminability”

Thursday, April 26 / 4 PM / Humanities 210

E´tienne Balibar has argued that in both Arendt’s analysis of the Nazi extermination of Jews and Foucault’s work on the extermination of the abnormals there is an argument that before a society engages in extermination it goes through a social state where those who are to be exterminated are, in effect, prepared for their extermination. Ghassan Hage calls this social state a culture of exterminability. He writes:

This is because I want to emphasize the production of a total social environment and climate in which the pratice of extermination becomes something that can be practically contemplated: society cannot produce its potential exterminable others without producing at the same time its potential exterminators. I will argue that we in the Western world are already living in such a culture of exterminability where the exterminable is located in the dominant imaginary of the Muslim other.

Ghassan Hage is Professor of Anthropology at the University of Sydney. He has been a visiting professor at the American University of Beirut, University of Copenhagen, Université de Paris X –Nanterre, and at Pierre Bourdieu’s Centre de Sociologie Européenne at the École des Hautes Études Internationales, Paris. He is currently visiting professor and research associate at the Center for the Study of World Religions at Harvard. Hage’s research centers on the comparative study of nationalism, racism, and multiculturalism. His most important works in that domain are White Nation (Pluto and Routledge, 2000) and Against Paranoid Nationalism (Pluto and Merlin, 2003). He has also published widely on the Lebanese civil war and on the Lebanese diaspora. He is currently working on an ethnography of Lebanese Muslims in France, England, the U.S., and Australia.

April 5, 2007 – Ruth Wilson Gilmore: “The Prison Industrial Complex After 25 Years”

Thursday, April 5 / 4 PM / Oakes Mural Room

Providing a trenchant examination of California prisons, shifting patterns of capital investment and incarceration, and increases in punitive justice in the post-Civil Rights era, Ruth Wilson Gilmore will speak about her new book Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California, a January 2007 release in the American Crossroads Series of the University of California Press.

Ruth Wilson Gilmore is Associate Professor of Geography and Director of the Program in American Studies and Ethnicity at the University of Southern California. She is a member of the founding collective of Critical Resistance, one of the most important national anti-prison organizations in the United States. Trained as a geographer, Professor Gilmore is an expert in race and justice issues, and has been at USC since 2004.

Sponsored by the Critical Race Studies Research Cluster and the Sociology Department, with co-sponsorship by the Center for Justice, Tolerance, and Community, the Institute for Advanced Feminist Research, Stevenson College, and the Departments of Anthropology, Feminist Studies, History of Consciousness, Latin American and Latino Studies, and Psychology